THE MONEY MASTERS is a 3 1/2 hour non-fiction, historical documentary that traces the origins of the political potential structure. The modern political potential structure has its roots in the hidden manipulation and accumulation of gold and other forms of money. The enhancement of fractional reserve banking practices in the 17th century brought to a cunning sophistication the secret techniques initially used by goldsmiths fraudulently to accumulate wealth. With the formation of the privately-owned Bank of England in 1694, the yoke of economic slavery to a privately-owned central bank was first forced upon the backs of an entire nation, not removed but only made heavier with the passing of the three centuries to our day. Nation after nation has fallen prey to this cabal of global central bankers. The success of the central banking scheme developed into a far-reaching plot described by President Clintons mentor, Georgetown Professor Carroll Quigley, to make a world system of financial control in confidential hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the nation of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for Global Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a confidential bank owned and controlled by the worlds central banks which were themselves confidential …
The bank gets bailed out by an equity infusion from a sovereign wealth fund.
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Ya know, I like most of this documentary, but seriously, can he quit pointing the pen? You seem legit, but the pen pointing…come on!
There is no mention in any of this series of videos that the bankers are all JEWS.
@ladicius well it is doable for the company to have say an authorized capital of 5 billion shares at a face value of 1$,now as the whole issued capital was only 500 million they still can issue more shares by way of an fpo etc so they may possibly issue shares to the SWF but that would essentially dilute their equity in the company
Goldman brothers and Lehman Sachs!
@delegate21 were you responding to a question similar to ‘how did swf buy 2b shares when there were only 500m?’…that was my question…
yeah, dude, you’re the man!
For TARP, the majority of equity infusion was in the form of preferred stock and warrants.
The federal reserve in no more federal than federal express. It is a foreign confidential central bank whose board members are held secret. So when you say our national debt is owed to ourselves that is flat out lie. You need to bone up on some history before you call yourself an economist. Do you know what money is or how it is made? In a right free market system there is no need for any regulatory body to adjust the ‘supply’ of money or interest rates. Stop reading Keynes and start reading Mises
So is an “Equity infusion” what Goldman Sachs did recently to raise $6bn? I haven’t been following that closely, but it doesn’t seem to me that the shareholders in Goldman got hit by this latest go? If Goldman didn’t do an Equity Infusion, then what was it they did?
Well if the SWF fund it self was worried about going bankrupt, say due to a entitlements issue. It would need to make long term funds. The model here shows a functional bank, with toxic assets. Or “the fundamentals are of our nation are strong”. This is just a momentary blip, to allow the SWF long term funds to pay entitlements. Is my estimate…
Because the SWF would then own 80% of the bank, and it’s in their best interest for it to stay afloat, and that requires them paying over the market value for them, instead of just buying more. If they simply bought more shares, they would dilute the share value further, thus losing money etc… (its better off for the bank to have less shares)
exactly, and this is whats happening in real life right now…doesn’t make sense. they are technically buying way above market value…because co’s can’t sell it privately.
Why would the SWF pay more then market value? That doesn’t make sense in this example.
You rock! I am a teacher & I really take pleasure in your delivery style. Keep up the fantastic work!!
THE FED!!
This video has the FIRST mention of the
FEDERAL RESERVE in the series.
THE ‘FED’ is the real ‘crucks’ of the PROBLEM!
END the FED NOV 22nd
endthefed(dot)us
Wow. That last part was very fascinating. So a foreign investor may possibly buy the majority stock of a failing company. And instantly see an increase in stock price despite the fact that tons of new stock have been made.
I reckon I can see now why all of these businesses have been gobbling each other up the last couple years.
It still seems counter-intuitive though
We’re “Goldman Brothers” or “Lehman Sachs” lol!
Khan fantastic job! This is far more rewarding than watching TV. Do you have a playlist explaining how you gained your experience and your insight? Why you started doing you tube videos? Are you hiring? Can I submit my resume to you for a job so that I force learn some more first hand?
the loan was due because corporations often take out loans for a small term like 3 months.
it’s a shame that 10,000 people have seen Bailout 1 and only 853 people have seen bailout 6 so far. This just tells me people aren’t as interested in or able to be with you this subject as they say they are.
Sal, why did the company need to pay of Loans A and B (in the previous video)? May possibly they not have not paid them off and accrued a bit more interest while still holding on to persons solid bonds?
He doesn’t teach at MIT, but he should.
I DID go to MIT, and don’t reckon it was clarified as well there. Fantastic work!
Thankfulness professor. If I had you as a teacher I’d have gone to MIT lol.